kb/data/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect-4.md

7.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

title chunk source category tags date_saved instance
Casimir effect 5/6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect reference science, encyclopedia 2026-05-05T10:54:44.616020+00:00 kb-cron
    ⟨
    E
    (
    t
    )
    ⟩
    =
    
      
        1
        2
      
    
    
      ∑
      
        n
      
    
    ℏ
    
      |
    
    
      ω
      
        n
      
    
    
      |
    
    exp
    
    
      
        (
      
    
    
    t
    
      |
    
    
      ω
      
        n
      
    
    
      |
    
    
      
        )
      
    
    
    ,
  

{\displaystyle \langle E(t)\rangle ={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{n}\hbar |\omega _{n}|\exp {\bigl (}-t|\omega _{n}|{\bigr )}\,,}

where the limit t → 0+ is taken in the end. The divergence of the sum is typically manifested as

    ⟨
    E
    (
    t
    )
    ⟩
    =
    
      
        C
        
          t
          
            3
          
        
      
    
    +
    
      
        finite
      
    
    
  

{\displaystyle \langle E(t)\rangle ={\frac {C}{t^{3}}}+{\textrm {finite}}\,}

for three-dimensional cavities. The infinite part of the sum is associated with the bulk constant C which does not depend on the shape of the cavity. The interesting part of the sum is the finite part, which is shape-dependent. The Gaussian regulator

    ⟨
    E
    (
    t
    )
    ⟩
    =
    
      
        1
        2
      
    
    
      ∑
      
        n
      
    
    ℏ
    
      |
    
    
      ω
      
        n
      
    
    
      |
    
    exp
    
    
      (
      
        
        
          t
          
            2
          
        
        
          |
        
        
          ω
          
            n
          
        
        
          
            |
          
          
            2
          
        
      
      )
    
  

{\displaystyle \langle E(t)\rangle ={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{n}\hbar |\omega _{n}|\exp \left(-t^{2}|\omega _{n}|^{2}\right)}

is better suited to numerical calculations because of its superior convergence properties, but is more difficult to use in theoretical calculations. Other, suitably smooth, regulators may be used as well. The zeta function regulator

    ⟨
    E
    (
    s
    )
    ⟩
    =
    
      
        1
        2
      
    
    
      ∑
      
        n
      
    
    ℏ
    
      |
    
    
      ω
      
        n
      
    
    
      |
    
    
      |
    
    
      ω
      
        n
      
    
    
      
        |
      
      
        
        s
      
    
  

{\displaystyle \langle E(s)\rangle ={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{n}\hbar |\omega _{n}||\omega _{n}|^{-s}}

is completely unsuited for numerical calculations, but is quite useful in theoretical calculations. In particular, divergences show up as poles in the complex s plane, with the bulk divergence at s = 4. This sum may be analytically continued past this pole, to obtain a finite part at s = 0. Not every cavity configuration necessarily leads to a finite part (the lack of a pole at s = 0) or shape-independent infinite parts. In this case, it should be understood that additional physics has to be taken into account. In particular, at extremely large frequencies (above the plasma frequency), metals become transparent to photons (such as X-rays), and dielectrics show a frequency-dependent cutoff as well. This frequency dependence acts as a natural regulator. There are a variety of bulk effects in solid state physics, mathematically very similar to the Casimir effect, where the cutoff frequency comes into explicit play to keep expressions finite. (These are discussed in greater detail in Landau and Lifshitz, "Theory of Continuous Media".)

== Generalities == The Casimir effect can also be computed using the mathematical mechanisms of functional integrals of quantum field theory, although such calculations are considerably more abstract, and thus difficult to comprehend. In addition, they can be carried out only for the simplest of geometries. However, the formalism of quantum field theory makes it clear that the vacuum expectation value summations are in a certain sense summations over so-called "virtual particles". More interesting is the understanding that the sums over the energies of standing waves should be formally understood as sums over the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian. This allows atomic and molecular effects, such as the Van der Waals force, to be understood as a variation on the theme of the Casimir effect. Thus one considers the Hamiltonian of a system as a function of the arrangement of objects, such as atoms, in configuration space. The change in the zero-point energy as a function of changes of the configuration can be understood to result in forces acting between the objects. In the chiral bag model of the nucleon, the Casimir energy plays an important role in showing the mass of the nucleon is independent of the bag radius. In addition, the spectral asymmetry is interpreted as a non-zero vacuum expectation value of the baryon number, cancelling the topological winding number of the pion field surrounding the nucleon. A "pseudo-Casimir" effect can be found in liquid crystal systems, where the boundary conditions imposed through anchoring by rigid walls give rise to a long-range force, analogous to the force that arises between conducting plates.

== Dynamical Casimir effect == The dynamical Casimir effect is the production of particles and energy from an accelerated moving mirror. This reaction was predicted by certain numerical solutions to quantum mechanics equations made in the 1970s. In May 2011 an announcement was made by researchers at the Chalmers University of Technology, in Gothenburg, Sweden, of the detection of the dynamical Casimir effect. In their experiment, microwave photons were generated out of the vacuum in a superconducting microwave resonator. These researchers used a modified SQUID to change the effective length of the resonator in time, mimicking a mirror moving at the required relativistic velocity. If confirmed this would be the first experimental verification of the dynamical Casimir effect. In March 2013 an article appeared on the PNAS scientific journal describing an experiment that demonstrated the dynamical Casimir effect in a Josephson metamaterial. In July 2019 an article was published describing an experiment providing evidence of optical dynamical Casimir effect in a dispersion-oscillating fibre. In 2020, Frank Wilczek et al., proposed a resolution to the information loss paradox associated with the moving mirror model of the dynamical Casimir effect. Constructed within the framework of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, the dynamical Casimir effect (moving mirror) has been used to help understand the Unruh effect.