973 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
973 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "BET theory"
|
||
chunk: 2/4
|
||
source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BET_theory"
|
||
category: "reference"
|
||
tags: "science, encyclopedia"
|
||
date_saved: "2026-05-05T10:03:51.162056+00:00"
|
||
instance: "kb-cron"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
Adsorptions occur only on well-defined sites of the sample surface (one per molecule)
|
||
The only molecular interaction considered is the following one: a molecule can act as a single adsorption site for a molecule of the upper layer.
|
||
The uppermost molecule layer is in equilibrium with the gas phase, i.e. similar molecule adsorption and desorption rates.
|
||
The desorption is a kinetically limited process, i.e. a heat of adsorption must be provided:
|
||
these phenomena are homogeneous, i.e. same heat of adsorption for a given molecule layer.
|
||
it is E1 for the first layer, i.e. the heat of adsorption at the solid sample surface
|
||
the other layers are assumed similar and can be represented as condensed species, i.e. liquid state. Hence, the heat of adsorption is EL is equal to the heat of liquefaction.
|
||
At the saturation pressure, the molecule layer number tends to infinity (i.e. equivalent to the sample being surrounded by a liquid phase)
|
||
Consider a given amount of solid sample in a controlled atmosphere. Let θi be the fractional coverage of the sample surface covered by a number i of successive molecule layers. Let us assume that the adsorption rate Rads,i-1 for molecules on a layer (i-1) (i.e. formation of a layer i) is proportional to both its fractional surface θi-1 and to the pressure P, and that the desorption rate Rdes,i on a layer i is also proportional to its fractional surface θi:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
|
||
a
|
||
d
|
||
s
|
||
|
||
,
|
||
i
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
Θ
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle R_{\mathrm {ads} ,i-1}=k_{i}P\Theta _{i-1}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
|
||
|
||
d
|
||
e
|
||
s
|
||
|
||
,
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Θ
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
,
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle R_{\mathrm {des} ,i}=k_{-i}\Theta _{i},}
|
||
|
||
|
||
where ki and k−i are the kinetic constants (depending on the temperature) for the adsorption on the layer (i−1) and desorption on layer i, respectively. For the adsorptions, these constants are assumed similar whatever the surface.
|
||
Assuming an Arrhenius law for desorption, the related constants can be expressed as
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
exp
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
/
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
T
|
||
)
|
||
,
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle k_{i}=\exp(-E_{i}/RT),}
|
||
|
||
|
||
where Ei is the heat of adsorption, equal to E1 at the sample surface and to EL otherwise.
|
||
Consider some substance A. The adsorption of A onto an available surface site
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{0}}
|
||
|
||
produces a new site
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{1}}
|
||
|
||
on the first layer. In summary,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
g
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A(g) +}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{0}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {<=>}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{1}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Extending this to higher order layers one obtains
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
g
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A(g) +}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{1}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {<=>}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{2}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
and similarly
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
g
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A(g) +}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n-1}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {<=>}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
∗
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle (*)_{n}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Denoting the activity of the number of available sites of the
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n}
|
||
|
||
th layer with
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{n}}
|
||
|
||
and the partial pressure of A with
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle P}
|
||
|
||
, the last equilibrium can be written
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle K_{n}={\frac {\theta _{n}}{P\theta _{n-1}}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
It follows that the coverage of the first layer can be written
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{1}=K_{1}P\theta _{0}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
and that the coverage of the second layer can be written
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{2}=K_{2}P\theta _{1}=K_{2}PK_{1}P\theta _{0}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Realising that the adsorption of A onto the second layer is equivalent to adsorption of A onto its own liquid phase, the rate constant for
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
>
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n>1}
|
||
|
||
should be the same, which results in the recursion
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
ℓ
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{n}=(K_{\ell }P)^{n-1}PK_{1}\theta _{0}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
In order to simplify some infinite summations, let
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
ℓ
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle x=K_{\ell }P}
|
||
|
||
and let
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
y
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
P
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle y=K_{1}P}
|
||
|
||
. Then the
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n}
|
||
|
||
th layer coverage can written
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
c
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
,
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
>
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{n}=c\theta _{0}x^{n},\quad n>0}
|
||
|
||
|
||
if
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
c
|
||
=
|
||
y
|
||
|
||
/
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle c=y/x}
|
||
|
||
. The coverage of any layer is defined as the relative number of available sites. An alternative definition, which leads to a set of coverage's that are numerically to those resulting from the original way of defining surface coverage, is that
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{n}}
|
||
|
||
denotes the relative number of sites covered by only
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n}
|
||
|
||
adsorbents. Doing so it is easy to see that the total volume of adsorbed molecules can be written as the sum
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
ads
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
∑
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
=
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
∞
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
c
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
∑
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
=
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
∞
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
−
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle V_{\text{ads}}=V_{\text{m}}\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n\theta _{n}=V_{\text{m}}c\theta _{0}x\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }nx^{n-1}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle V_{\text{m}}}
|
||
|
||
is the molecular volume. Employing the fact that this sum is the first derivative of a geometric sum, the volume becomes
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
ads
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
c
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
0
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
1
|
||
−
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
<
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle V_{\text{ads}}=V_{\text{m}}c\theta _{0}{\frac {x}{(1-x)^{2}}},\quad |x|<1}
|
||
|
||
|
||
Since the total coverage of a mono-layer must be unity, the full mono-layer coverage must be
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
∑
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
=
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
∞
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle 1=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\theta _{n}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
In order to properly make the substitution for
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
θ
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \theta _{n}}
|
||
|
||
, the restriction
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
n
|
||
>
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle n>1}
|
||
|
||
forces us to take the zeroth contribution outside the summation, resulting in |