2.2 KiB
| title | chunk | source | category | tags | date_saved | instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farrer hypothesis | 2/2 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrer_hypothesis | reference | science, encyclopedia | 2026-05-05T09:59:32.347575+00:00 | kb-cron |
The first is that he would not have omitted some of the Matthean texts that he did because they are so striking. Farrer replies that they were omitted because they do not conform to the 'edifice' that Luke is building. The second is that Luke sometimes preserves a more primitive version of a text that is also in Matthew. Farrer replies that this depends on being able to identify the more primitive text; for example, "Blessed are the poor in spirit" suits Matthew's theology, but it would be natural for Luke to drop the "in spirit" to fit his concern with the poor. The third is that Luke follows Mark's order but does not do the same with Matthew. Farrer asks, in reply, why he should: "Is it surprising that he should lay his plan on Marcan foundations, and quarry St. Matthew for materials to build up his house?" The fourth is that Luke uses the material less well than Matthew. Farrer replies that this may be so, but he would not be the first adapter to have produced a less skilful result, the only issue was whether it would suit Luke's message better to have the material arranged in this way. The final argument is that Luke does not use the material within the same Marcan paragraphs as Matthew. Farrer points out that he takes them out of a Marcan context and reproduces them elsewhere. In chapters 10–18, Luke reassembles the teaching material in a way which makes the points that he wants to make, often by pairing sayings that have not been paired together before. This may have been to produce a Christian Deuteronomy, just as it was argued that Matthew's gospel was in the form of a Christian Pentateuch.
== See also == Markan priority Wilke hypothesis Griesbach hypothesis Four-document hypothesis Gospel of Marcion
== Notes ==
== References ==
== External links == On Dispensing With Q by Austin Farrer The Case Against Q web site by Mark Goodacre The Synoptic Problem and the Non-existence of Q, by Evan Powell Matthew Conflator (Wilke) Hypothesis, by Alan Garrow Overview of proposed solutions by Stephen C. Carlson