943 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
943 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "Bond graph"
|
||
chunk: 4/11
|
||
source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_graph"
|
||
category: "reference"
|
||
tags: "science, encyclopedia"
|
||
date_saved: "2026-05-05T14:13:40.582713+00:00"
|
||
instance: "kb-cron"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
exp
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
exp
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v=\kappa \left(\exp {\frac {\mu _{A}}{RT}}-\exp {\frac {\mu _{B}}{RT}}\right)=\kappa \left(K_{A}x_{A}-K_{B}x_{B}\right)}
|
||
|
||
|
||
where the subscripts correspond to the species. This is the simple mass-action equation:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v=k^{+}x_{A}-k^{-}x_{B}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
+
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
and
|
||
|
||
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle k^{+}=\kappa K_{A}{\text{ and }}k^{-}=\kappa K_{B}}
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
|
||
==== Enzyme-catalysed reaction ====
|
||
|
||
As discussed in section 1.4 of Keener & Sneyd, an enzyme-catalysed reaction reversibly transforming species
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A}}}
|
||
|
||
to species
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {B}}}
|
||
|
||
via enzyme
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {E}}}
|
||
|
||
and enzyme complex
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {C}}}
|
||
|
||
can be written as the pair of reactions:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
+
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
+
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A + E <=> C <=> B + E}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
The enzyme complex
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {C}}}
|
||
|
||
is formed from
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
+
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A + E}}}
|
||
|
||
and decomposes into the species
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {B}}}
|
||
|
||
and releases enzyme
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
E
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {E}}}
|
||
|
||
. The bond graph shown in the figure shows how the enzyme is recycled.
|
||
The bond graph can be used to derive the properties of these reactions which are of generalised Michaelis-Menten form.
|
||
|
||
=== Energy transduction ===
|
||
|
||
The bond graph TF (transformer) component represents energy transduction either within or between energy domains. (Note that the TF component has been called the TD (transduction) component - TF is more widely used.) This section focuses on transduction between the chemical domain with effort
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \mu }
|
||
|
||
(J/mol) and flow
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v}
|
||
|
||
(mol/s) and a generic domain with effort
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle e}
|
||
|
||
and flow
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
f
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle f}
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
The key feature of the TF component is that it transmits energy without dissipation; hence, with reference to the figure:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
f
|
||
=
|
||
μ
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle ef=\mu v}
|
||
|
||
|
||
The transformer has a modulus m (with appropriate units) so that:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
f
|
||
=
|
||
m
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle f=mv}
|
||
|
||
|
||
the energy formula then implies that:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
=
|
||
m
|
||
e
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \mu =me}
|
||
|
||
|
||
==== Stoichiometry ====
|
||
|
||
The stoichiometry of a chemical reaction determines how many of each chemical species occurs. Thus, for example, the reaction
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
↽
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
⇀
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A <=> m B}}}
|
||
|
||
converts one mol of species
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {A}}}
|
||
|
||
to m mol of species
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\ce {B}}}
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
The case where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
=
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle m=1}
|
||
|
||
corresponds to the simple reaction of the first example above. Using the same approach for general
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle m}
|
||
|
||
, the reaction flow is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
exp
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
exp
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
R
|
||
T
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
κ
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
−
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
K
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
x
|
||
|
||
B
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v=\kappa \left(\exp {\frac {\mu _{A}}{RT}}-\exp {\frac {m\mu _{B}}{RT}}\right)=\kappa \left(K_{A}x_{A}-(K_{B}x_{B})^{m}\right)}
|
||
|
||
|
||
==== Chemoelectrical transduction ====
|
||
This section looks at the case where the generic domain is the electrical domain so that effort is (electrical) voltage
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {V}}}
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
e
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle e={\mathcal {V}}}
|
||
|
||
) and the flow is current (
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
f
|
||
=
|
||
i
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle f=i}
|
||
|
||
). Consider the flow
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v}
|
||
|
||
of charged ions where the charge on the molecule is
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
z
|
||
ϵ
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle z\epsilon }
|
||
|
||
(Coulomb) where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
ϵ
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \epsilon }
|
||
|
||
is the charge on the electron measured in Coulomb; the charge associated with a mole of ions is thus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
z
|
||
ϵ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle z\epsilon N_{A}}
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle N_{A}}
|
||
|
||
is the Avogadro constant. The equivalent current is then
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
i
|
||
=
|
||
z
|
||
ϵ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
=
|
||
z
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle i=z\epsilon N_{A}v=z{\mathcal {F}}v}
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
=
|
||
ϵ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}=\epsilon N_{A}}
|
||
|
||
is the Faraday constant; thus the corresponding TF modulus is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
=
|
||
z
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle m=z{\mathcal {F}}}
|
||
|
||
(C/mol)
|
||
Again, it follows that
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
=
|
||
m
|
||
e
|
||
=
|
||
z
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \mu =me=z{\mathcal {F}}{\mathcal {V}}}
|
||
|
||
|
||
In this context, the bond graph TF component can be used to model energy flows associated with action potential, membrane transporters, cardiac action potential, and the mitochondrial electron transport chain.
|
||
|
||
==== Chemomechanical transduction ====
|
||
Consider a long rigid molecule such as actin where a sub unit of length
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
δ
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \delta }
|
||
|
||
(m) is added at a rate of
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle v}
|
||
|
||
(mol/sec). Then the tip velocity
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle V}
|
||
|
||
is given by:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
V
|
||
=
|
||
δ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
v
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle V=\delta N_{A}v}
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle N_{A}}
|
||
|
||
is the Avogadro constant.
|
||
Thus the modulus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
m
|
||
=
|
||
δ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle m=\delta N_{A}}
|
||
|
||
(m/mol) and
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
μ
|
||
=
|
||
m
|
||
F
|
||
=
|
||
δ
|
||
|
||
N
|
||
|
||
A
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle \mu =mF=\delta N_{A}F}
|
||
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
F
|
||
|
||
|
||
{\displaystyle F}
|
||
|
||
is the corresponding force at the tip.
|
||
These formulae have been used to generate force/velocity curves for actin filaments. The approach provides a useful alternative to the Brownian Ratchet approach as the bond graph TF component can be potentially used with modular bond graph models of cellular systems.
|
||
|
||
=== Applications ===
|
||
A number of systems relevant to systems biology have been modelled using bond graphs. These include:
|
||
|
||
Enterocyte homeostasis
|
||
Glucose transport
|
||
Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiological Modeling
|
||
Cerebral Circulation
|
||
Gene regulatory networks
|
||
Actin filament polymerization
|
||
Biochemical oscillators
|
||
Photosynthesis
|
||
Blood circulation
|
||
Simplified E. coli
|
||
Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain
|
||
Action potential
|
||
|
||
== Causality ==
|
||
|
||
Causality is a word with many uses and connotations. In the context of bond graphs, however, it has a limited, precise but important meaning and allows the bond graph model of a system to be converted to various other forms including a (nonlinear) state-space representation. The causality concept can also be used to examine structural properties, including inversion, of the system represented by a bond graph as well as to expose modelling errors.
|
||
|
||
=== R, C and I components === |