diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index f54d700..961e388 100755 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -1508,21 +1508,54 @@ optimization pipeline and pointer-based weight mapping system

Figure 2: Lossless Pointer-Based Weight Mapping

-
- graph LR - subgraph "Traditional Storage" - A1["Weight Matrix (4.2B values)"] --> B1["Raw Storage (16.8 GB FP32)"] - B1 --> C1["Many Duplicate Values (Redundant Memory)"] - end - subgraph "Moxiegen Pointer Mapping" - A2["Weight Matrix (4.2B values)"] --> B2["Scan & Hash All Values"] - B2 --> C2["Unique Value Pool (~450M values)"] - C2 --> D2["Pointer Index (Map positions to IDs)"] - D2 --> E2["Compressed Storage (~2.1 GB Total)"] - end - style B2 fill:#064e3b,color:#f8fafc,stroke:#34d399 - style C2 fill:#78350f,color:#f8fafc,stroke:#fbbf24 - style E2 fill:#065f46,color:#f8fafc,stroke:#34d399 +
+ + + + Traditional Storage + + + Weight Matrix (4.2B values) + + + + + Raw Storage (16.8 GB FP32) + + + + + Duplicate Values (Redundant) + + + + Moxiegen Pointer Mapping + + + Weight Matrix (4.2B values) + + + + + Scan & Hash All Values + + + + + Unique Value Pool (~450M) + + + + + Compressed Storage (~2.1 GB) + + + + + + + +

Figure 2: Comparison of traditional weight storage versus Moxiegen's pointer-based deduplication

@@ -1600,21 +1633,24 @@

Figure 3: Memory Efficiency Breakdown

- - - - - - - + + + + + + + + - 95% - memory reduction + 95% + memory reduction - - Traditional FP32 — 940 GB - - Moxiegen — 47 GB + + Traditional FP32 — 940 GB + + Moxiegen — 47 GB

Figure 3: Dramatic memory reduction achieved through pointer-based weight @@ -1679,60 +1715,62 @@

Figure 4: Energy Consumption Comparison

-
- +
+ - - + + - Traditional A100 Cluster + Traditional A100 Cluster - - - 12x A100 GPUs + + + 12x A100 GPUs - Power Draw - 4,200W + Power Draw + 4,200W - + - Annual Energy - 36,792 kWh + Annual Energy + 36,792 kWh - CO2 Emissions - 16.5 t/yr + CO2 Emissions + 16.5 t/yr - Moxiegen Method + Moxiegen Method - - - 1x RTX 3060 + + + 1x RTX 3060 - Power Draw - 170W + Power Draw + 170W - + - Annual Energy - 1,489 kWh + Annual Energy + 1,489 kWh - CO2 Emissions - 0.67 t/yr + CO2 Emissions + 0.67 t/yr - - - 96% - less energy + + 96% + less energy + + +

Figure 4: Environmental impact comparison showing 96% reduction in energy