---
title: "Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle"
chunk: 1/3
source: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time's_Arrow,_Time's_Cycle"
category: "reference"
tags: "science, encyclopedia"
date_saved: "2026-05-05T03:34:40.309869+00:00"
instance: "kb-cron"
---

Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time is a 1987 history of geology by the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, in which the author offers a historical account of the conceptualization of Deep Time and uniformitarianism using the works of the English theologian Thomas Burnet, and the Scottish geologists James Hutton and Charles Lyell.

== Deep Time ==
Gould ranks the development of the concept "deep time," which involved deliberately rejecting the biblical description of earth's past for nearly incomprehensible eons, with the revolutions associated with Copernicus and Charles Darwin.  To illustrate this, Gould picked three major figures in the history of geology, one traditional villain (Thomas Burnet) and two traditional heroes (James Hutton and Charles Lyell).

== Flimsy 'cardboard' ==
Standard textbook accounts of the achievements of these three figures have long provided what Gould describes as a "self-serving mythology."  These flimsy "cardboard" accounts vaunt the superiority of empiricism and inductivism over the scientific nemesis of religious bigotry.
This legend, as perpetuated by geology textbooks over the last century, claims that geology remained in the service of the Mosaic story of creation so long as armchair geological theorists refused to place fieldwork ahead of scriptural authority.  Thomas Burnet was just such an archetypical religious spokesman.  A century later, Hutton heroically broke with this biblical zealotry by arguing that geological evidence must rest upon a solid empirical foundation.  The Earth's strata, when carefully examined, betray "no vestige of a beginning—no prospect of an end."   But Hutton was far ahead of his time. So it was not until Charles Lyell published the Principles of Geology that geologists finally came to accept Hutton's basic message and banished miraculous intervention, catastrophes, and biblical deluges from their science.
Having elaborated this bit of scientific melodrama, Gould proceeds to demolish it by showing that the actualities of Hutton's and Lyell's work were the opposite of the textbook legend.  His intention is not simply to debunk the textbook legend, which has already been debunked by historians such as Martin J. S. Rudwick.  He sets out to rectify the error and show the real sources of inspiration in the development of deep time which have not been properly understood.

== Kuhnian revolutions ==
Gould is deeply influenced by Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962).  Kuhn argued, in part, that science is a social activity and that theories are intellectual constructions imposed on data, not demanded by them.   Along with Kuhn and other philosophers and sociologists of science, Gould has recognized that mental constructs (metaphors, analogies, personal philosophies, imaginative leaps)—not empirical discoveries—are what bring about scientific advance.   "Facts" are so embedded in a paradigm that they simply do not have the kind of independent probative power they were once thought to possess.
The development of the idea of deep time is by no means fieldwork, as the textbook myths would have us believe.   Rather, Gould pinpoints a powerful pair of metaphors—time's arrow and time's cycle—by which humankind has always tried to grasp the concept of time. Time's arrow captures the uniqueness and distinctive character of sequential events, whereas time's cycle provides these events with another kind of meaning by evoking lawfulness and predictability.
More importantly, this metaphorical pair of ideas was essential to the thinking of the three geological protagonists; and the paired concepts therefore offer the key, now obscured by textbook mythology, to unlocking their thinking about time.

== Burnet ==
Burnet's theory is a one-cycle theory in which biblical narrative (time's arrow) runs its course within a wider conception of "the great year" and "great circle of time and fate" that bring about the return of Paradise.
It is his belief in Scripture that made Burnet a pariah in the history of geology.  Yet Burnet was hardly the religious fanatic he is painted to have been within the context of his contemporary scientific thought.
In contrast to textbook legend, Burnet was adamant about explaining the Biblical history of the earth entirely within the frame of natural science, devoid of all appeals to miracles or divine intervention. Thus this "bad guy" of geological textbook history was actually more devoted to rational, miracle-free science than the greatest scientists of his age.